Fri, Jul 17th, 2009
Related topics:
Oh, for heaven's sake. Everyone from CNET to the New York Times is up in arms over Amazon's recent decision to remotely delete copies of two George Orwell novels it sold to Kindle owners on behalf of an independent publisher.
But not even the usually sensible David Pogue of the Times appears to have done any actual research on the subject. Am I the only blogger in the world who cares about getting the facts right instead of just going for the quick and easy chance to smear Amazon? Or just the only one who can see the obvious?
Related stories from top sites:
Amazon redacts Orwell on Kindle like it's '1984'
Jul 17th, 2009 - MSNBC
"There was of course no way of knowing whether you were being watched at any given moment. How often, or on what system, the Thought Police plugged in on any individual...
Report: CIT Group board OKs $3 billion rescue loan
Jul 17th, 2009 - Forbes.com
CIT Group Inc.'s board approved a deal late Sunday with major bondholders to keep the company out of bankruptcy with a $3 billion rescue loan, the New York Times reported.
Amazon vanishes 1984 from citizen Kindles
Jul 17th, 2009 - The Register
In an irony-filled moment that underlines the flaws of our increasingly digital society, Amazon has removed George Orwell's 1984 from America's Kindle ebook readers. As...
Amazon says it won't repeat Kindle book recall
Jul 17th, 2009 - CNET
Amazon said late Friday that it recalled two Kindle e-books because the publisher lacked the rights to the book. However, in the future, it says it won't pull already downloaded material from customers' devices.
Goldman makes peace with blogger in trademark case
Jul 17th, 2009 - Reuters
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Goldman Sachs Group Inc has quietly reached an agreement to end a legal dispute with a blogger who will be allowed to keep running a website critical of the investment bank.




Leave a Reply