Court Wary of Ban On Cruelty Videos

Oct 6th, 2009 - Washington Post

Related content:

It has been 25 years since the Supreme Court decided a category of speech -- child pornography -- was so unredeeming that it did not merit the protection of the First Amendment. Justices gave no indication Tuesday that they were ready to add another.

In an oral argument on animal cruelty that touched on bullfighting, cockfighting, fattening geese to make pate and even a hypothetical "human sacrifice channel," the court searched for the limits of the Constitution's guarantee of free speech. The justices indicated Congress had gone too far in its attempt to protect animals from abuse.

Read the whole story on Washington Post or try our Toolbar
Bookmark and Share
blog comments powered by Disqus

Related stories:

More stories ...

Related videos from YouTube:

More videos ...

Google Search: